Interaction designer
AI displacement risk
28%
Range 24.62–32.04%
Interaction designer has 75% AI task overlap but 44% human bottleneck protection — at the 77th percentile across 562 occupations. High exposure meets organizational friction, creating offsetting forces.
Professionals·SGD 7,883/mo (5,913–11,400)·~2.7K workers in SG·Updated 2026-06-11
Structural pressure, not a prediction of job loss. Displacement tends to arrive through slower hiring, wage compression and role redesign before layoffs.
Why This Score
75% of tasks overlap with current AI
44% human advantage from judgment & presence
57% demand buffer from the local labour market
AI usage 8pp above theoretical exposure
These factors interact with each other — the final score is not a simple sum of these bars.
How much AI overlaps with this job's tasks, offset by human advantages and local demand. Score stability: watch. How this works
Tasks AI can handle
With 75% AI task overlap (based on Felten AIOE, Anthropic Economic Index, Eloundou GPT exposure, and ILO occupational exposure), the Interaction designer tasks most exposed include: generating visual concepts, creating layout variations, producing mockups from descriptions, and automating repetitive design tasks like resizing.
- • Identify target markets for designs, looking at factors such as age, gender, and socioeconomic status.
- • Read scripts and consult directors and other production staff to develop design concepts and plan productions.
- • Sketch rough and detailed drawings of apparel or accessories, and write specifications such as color schemes, construction, material types, and accessory requirements.
O*NET tasks for this occupation with the most observed AI usage (Anthropic task data).
What AI can't do here
At 44% human bottleneck protection, the tasks that remain hardest to automate for Interaction designer include: understanding user needs through research, making aesthetic judgments that reflect brand identity, designing for emotional impact, and iterating based on nuanced feedback.
Main insulation channels: Non-routine work + Deep preparation — the work-context dimensions behind this occupation's human bottleneck.
Skills to focus on
Sources: Felten AIOE (2021), Anthropic Economic Index (2026), Eloundou GPT Exposure (Science, 2024), ILO GenAI (2025), Pizzinelli et al. bottleneck model. Full methodology.
Singapore Now
Current labour market conditions and how they affect this role.
Cooling, but not collapsing. Vacancies and re-entry are softer, yet retrenchment remains low and hiring still exceeds resignations.
Vacancy
3.1%
↓ 3.1% YoY
Hiring
1.5%
vs 0.9% resign
Retrenchment
1.5
per 1,000 · low
Re-entry
67.7%
find work in 12mo· -5.3pp
Professionals, Managers, Executives & Technicians · 2025 Q4
Top Industries
Industry vacancy overlays use the latest published detailed cross-tab, which can lag the main labour monitor.
What You Can Do
Interaction designer has some offset potential, but it depends on task redesign holding up in practice and on workers clearing the main switching frictions.
Published transition support
Related roles you could transition to
Risk-reducingThis occupation sits in the structurally vulnerable quadrant: high displacement pressure, and its best adjacent move ranks in the weakest quarter of exit options among high-risk occupations. Mobility research finds outcomes hinge on escape-route quality, not pressure alone. See all occupations in this quadrant.
Compare within Professionals
Modern roles using this occupation
See how this compares to similar occupations
Compare with... →Classification
Higher risk than 77% of occupations · V7 structural score
Raw scores
AIOE 0.919 · θ 0.668 · C-AIOE 0.751
Stability
watch · Optimistic 26% · Pessimistic 36%
Score range (best/worst case)
Exposure 70–77% · Net risk 24.62–32.04%
Scoring basis
V7 structural score. Uses task-concentration-weighted exposure, human bottleneck, and demand resilience. V6 baseline fields are retained for release-to-release comparison.-2.7pp versus retained V6 baseline.
Wage range (SGD/mo)
25th 5,913 · Median 7,883 · 75th 11,400
Evidence & sources
Data matching
direct · SSOC 21664
Real-world AI usage: +8% vs estimated
Data quality
77% · Matching 0.55 · Market data 0.70 · Freshness 0.84
100% weighted task match · 8% effective coverage
AI overlap by data source
Weights: aioe 24% · anthropic 26% · eloundou 25% · ilo 26%
Conflicting data signals
Tools & offset factors
What helps
- A meaningful share of the work can likely be reorganized around AI rather than removed outright.
What could slow it down
- Current demand support is thin, so offsets may take longer to show up.
Worker profile & local context
- Vacancy rate is 3.1% and was essentially flat versus last quarter.
- Hiring read: recruitment is running above resignation (1.5% vs 0.9%).
- Retrenchment was low at 1.5 per 1,000 employees.
- 67.7% of retrenched workers re-entered employment within 12 months.
- Live job ads show 0 visible postings in the last 30 days, led by Figma, Stakeholder Management.
- Employer pressure is low, based on 1 recent Singapore-relevant company signals.
Worker profile
Gender mix
69% male / 31% femalePublished Singapore worker composition for the detailed occupation family 21 Science & Engineering Professionals.
Employment structure
Employee-heavy96% employees, 4% employers or self-employed workers.
Work arrangement
Mostly full-time4% part-time and 96% full-time in 2025.
Age profile
Mid-career heavy14% aged 15 to 29, 62% aged 30 to 49, and 24% aged 50 or older.
Qualification mix
Degree-heavyDegree 81%; Diploma / professional qualification 15%.
Gross wage by sex
Female median 14% lowerPublished June 2024 gross wage medians: male $8,745, female $7,530.
Where this work is concentrated
Top planning areas
Sengkang, Bedok, Tampines19% of workers in this occupation group live in these three planning areas.
Residential concentration
Broadly distributed30% live across the top five planning areas in the 2020 Census.
Commute pattern
Mid-range commutesEstimated average commute 37.5 minutes. 33% take 46 minutes or more.
Role profile
How this role's work breaks down across key dimensions. This is a general profile, not an individual measurement.
Workflow dimensions (0 = low, 1 = high)
How this changes by career stage
Senior workers benefit from institutional knowledge and judgment that AI cannot replicate. Entry-level roles have higher task overlap with AI.
Frequently asked questions
Will AI replace Interaction designer?
Interaction designer has 75% AI task overlap but 44% human bottleneck protection — at the 77th percentile across 562 occupations. High exposure meets organizational friction, creating offsetting forces. Net displacement risk: 28% (Moderate). Median wage: SGD 7,883/month.
What is the AI risk score for Interaction designer?
Interaction designer has an AI displacement risk of 28%, rated Moderate. AI task overlap: 75%. Human advantage: 44%. Local demand buffer: 57%.
What career transitions are available for Interaction designer?
Interaction designer has modeled transition pathways to related occupations. The strongest adjacent pathway is Building architect, based on skill and wage similarity (model-estimated). Transition scoring accounts for wage preservation, training ease, and destination quality.
How does Interaction designer salary compare in the live market?
Interaction designer earns a median gross wage of SGD 7,883/month in the live market (25th-75th percentile: SGD 5,913-11,400). This is 75% above median across all 562 scored occupations, and 21% above group median within Professionals occupations.